December 7, 2024
The occasional show of force against Hamas interests has failed, as has destroying Gaza’s infrastructure — so too the opposite policy of good will and the prospect of economic prosperity.
Palestinian police officers loyal to Hamas march during a graduation ceremony in Gaza City, April 29, 2019.
Palestinian police officers loyal to Hamas march during a graduation ceremony in Gaza City, April 29, 2019.

As Israeli frustration mounts about violence coming out of Gaza, the idea of a ground invasion — and to once and for all finish with Hamas aggression — becomes more appealing. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has endorsed this approach, saying, “There probably won’t be a choice but to topple the Hamas regime.” While sympathetic to this impulse, I worry that too much attention is paid to tactics and not enough to goals. The result could be harmful to America’s foremost Middle East ally.

Attitudes toward Gaza are in flux. Efraim Inbar, the strategist who heads the Jerusalem Institute for Security Studies, for years advocated “mowing the grass” as “Israel’s strategy for protracted intractable conflict.” By this, he advocated an occasional reminder to Hamas’ rulers and other Gazans of Israel’s overwhelming power. Implicit in this approach is an acceptance that, most of the time, Israel accepts aggression from Gaza, with its attendant damage to property and life. As recently as May 2019, he dismissed the Palestinian threat to Israel as a “strategic nuisance.”

But Mr. Inbar recently recognized the high costs of this passivity and now calls for a “restricted ground invasion” of the territory. Why? Because “a short-term ground operation will bring better results than Israel’s activity thus far [i.e., mowing the lawn]. We need to maneuver inside enemy territory, locate them, and destroy them, or tie the hands of its members.”

Others agree.

[…]

Loading

Visited 22 times, 1 visit(s) today