Contrary to suggestions by some, most Trump supporters are not automatons or blind supporters. What bothers them, and should bother others, about the latest Ukraine hysteria’s is the familiar monotony of this latest scripted psychodrama.
The whistleblower admits to hearsay (“I was not a direct witness to most of the events described”). His term-paper report is laden with anonymously sourced rumors, e.g., “According to multiple White House officials I spoke with,” “I was told by White House officials,” “Based on my understanding,” “I learned from multiple officials,” “I do not know whether similar measures were taken,” “I do not know whether those officials spoke with or met with . . . ”
Between references to Internet news accounts and “I heard from” and “I learned from” and “I do not know” anonymous officials, there is nothing here to launch an impeachment of any president.
In the complaint are all the now-familiar tell-tale signs of pseudo-exactness, in the form of Mueller-report-like footnotes and page references to liberal media outlets such as Bloomberg, ABC, and the New York Times. There is the accustomed Steele-dossier scare bullet points. We see again Comey-memo-like disputes over classification status with capital letters UNCLASSIFIED stamped as headers and footers and TOP SECRET lined out.
[…]
See Also:
(1) Double Standards on Ukraine
(2) Rush Limbaugh: Democrats and media already experiencing ‘blowback’ over attacks on Trump
(3) Whistleblower complaint on Trump Ukraine call: read the document
(4) Adam Schiff Invents Transcript Of Trump Call With Ukraine President
(5) Trump vs. Iran: How Did Trump Become the Villain?
