May 21, 2025
Leaders' debate fiasco is Red Bull for cynics
The only novelties are a Maclean's debate without the prime minister and twice as many French-language debates as English. Needless to say, no one was asking for either.
The only novelties are a Maclean’s debate without the prime minister and twice as many French-language debates as English. Needless to say, no one was asking for either.

I am rarely accused, least of all by myself, of not being cynical enough about politics. But the record shows that as recently as Aug. 9, I held out some hope that the leaders’ debates during the upcoming federal election campaign could continue in the spirit of innovation and enterprise that began four years ago, when we suddenly had five debates instead of the usual two, organized and moderated by parties other than the usual consortium of broadcasters and their journalists.

I harboured this strange inkling, that something in Canadian politics might actually turn out better than possible, despite very ominous portents. The Liberals created the Leaders’ Debate Commission, led by former governor-general (and two-time federal leaders’ debate moderator) David Johnston, after the last election to fix a problem that was very difficult to identify — 2015 was the high-water mark for debates, after all — and it did nothing but reinvent the wheel.

To host this year’s “official” debates, the commission chose a consortium of media outlets that differed from the old consortium only in that it was much larger: every major print and broadcast news organization in the country jumped in the pool save The Globe and Mail, Maclean’s, and Postmedia’s and Quebecor’s various outlets.

[…]

See Also:

(1) Two leaders’ debates is more than enough